Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/79260
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title FinTech інновації як детермінанти розвитку національної економіки
Other Titles FinTech Innovations as Determinants of National Economy Development
Authors Rubanov, Pavlo Mykolaiovych  
ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-8786
Keywords FinTech інновації
цифровізація
технологізація
краудфандинг
онлайн-фінансування
криптовалюта
національна економіка
сектор публічного управління
сектор домогосподарств
економічний розвиток
інвестиції
FinTech innovation
digitalization
technologization
crowdfunding
online financing
cryptocurrency
national economy
public administration sector
household sector
economic development
investment
Type PhD Thesis
Date of Issue 2020
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/79260
Publisher Сумський державний університет
License Copyright not evaluated
Citation Рубанов, П.М. FinTech інновації як детермінанти розвитку національної економіки [Текст]: дисертація ... д-ра екон. наук, спец.: 08.00.03 – економіка та управління національним господарством; 08.00.08 – гроші, фінанси і кредит / П.М. Рубанов; наук. консультант С.В. Лєонов. - Суми: СумДУ, 2020. - 408 с.
Abstract У дисертації уточнено визначення сутності поняття "FinTech інновація", поглиблено критеріальну базу структуризації ринку FinTech інновацій та обгрунтовано їх роль у розвитку національної економіки. Розроблено методологічні засади інтегрального оцінювання рівня технологізації фінансових послуг, виявлено загальні закономірності його взаємного впливу з детермінантами розвитку національної економіки. Запропоновано структурно-логічну схему вибору моделі онлайн-фінансування, виявлено регіональні закономірності та детермінанти їх розвитку. Систематизовано ознаки, сфери функціонального використання й ризики криптовалют, запропоновано концепцію оцінювання їх вартості. Оцінено рівень цифрової фінансової інклюзії сектору домогосподарств, розроблено рекомендації щодо вибору моделі онлайн-фінансування в секторі нефінансових корпорацій.
The dissertation is devoted to the development of new and improvement of existing methodological approaches and methodological tools of consideration the impact of the main types of FinTech innovations on the development of the national economy as a whole and its individual sectors. It is proposed to define FinTech innovation as information-based innovation in the financial sphere, the introduction of which leads to radical changes in financial products, financial technologies (processes) and/or business models of financial intermediaries. The FinTech innovation market is proposed to be structured according to four basic criteria: type of financial service, type of entity – provider of FinTech-services, type of innovative technology that forms the basic concept of FinTech-services, focus consumer segment. The transformational impact of FinTech innovations on the national economy is considered by its sectors: the financial corporations sector (banking and non-banking financial institutions), the household sector, the enterprise sector (non-financial corporations) and the public administration sector. According to the results of the TFSI calculation, it is determined that the Scandinavian countries (Norway, Denmark, Finland, Sweden) and the Netherlands are characterized by a high level of technologization of financial services. Estonia, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg and Belgium have average, but close to high, TFSI levels. Average TFSI values are also typical for Ireland, Latvia, Germany, France, Austria and the Czech Republic. Ukraine belongs to the group of countries with critically low levels of technologization of financial services, along with Bulgaria, Romania and Greece. The rest of the EU has a low level of TFSI. Correlation analysis of the relationship between the parameters of the national economy and the level of technologization of financial services revealed that the highest level of correlation is observed between TFSI and indicators of ICT prevalence and readiness for digitalization; levels of financial and economic development have no decisive influence on the spread of FinTech innovations; political and social environment parameters have a strong correlation with TFSI; the environmental parameters of the national economy do not have any connection with innovations in the financial sector. Countries with a higher level of digitalization have more statistically significant correlations between the level of technologization of financial services and the parameters of the national economy development. With a high level of digitalization, the growth of the level of technologization of financial services is accompanied by a decrease in inequality in income distribution, as well as an increase in correlation between the level of technologization of financial services and the parameters of political and socio-cultural dimensions. The choice of the most acceptable model of online financing is made depending on the specifics of the provider (subject, purpose, monetization of income) and the recipient (subject, purpose and motivation) of financial resources. Cluster analysis of the impact of a country`s regional affiliation on the choice of the dominant model of online financing showed that the key factors in dividing countries into clusters are the volumes of peer-to-peer consumer loans, peer-to-peer business loans and online debt financing. At the same time, the regional features of the development of online financing are available in such parameters as the type of provider of financial resources; type of recipient of financial resources; direct participation of the online platform in providing loans as a lender. The main determinants of the growth of online financing operations in the country are the level of its economic development, innovation and financial inclusion; the relationship with the level of economic freedom is direct and moderate. On the other hand, the development of information and communication technologies and the nature of regulatory influence do not significantly affect the development of online financing. Cryptocurrency is a type of virtual money, characterized by a set of specific features, opportunities for functional use and risks. Taking into account the peculiarities of the economic nature and functional use of cryptocurrencies, it is proposed to assess their value from three positions: as a means of circulation and payment (exchange rate), as specific goods (mining costs) and as speculative assets (crypto market rates). Indicators of the level of digital financial inclusion in Ukraine are lower than the world average both in terms of the integrated indicator and its components. Digital financial inclusion of the household sector is not a significant determinant of reducing income inequality, but it largely determines the growth of economic well-being. FinTech innovations create alternative sources of financial resources for the sector of non-financial corporations (enterprises). The best suited models of online financing for small and medium-sized businesses are profit sharing crowdfunding, equity-based crowdfunding and reward-based crowdfunding, the choice of which is made in accordance with the purpose of attracting resources – financing current, investment and innovation activities. The success of online financing depends on the SMEs themselves, as well as on the providers of financial resources and the specifics of the online platform. In the context of the impact of FinTech innovations on the financial corporations sector, the development of digital and open banking is relevant for Ukraine. Regarding the public administration sector, FinTech innovations are manifested primarily through the emergence of new regulatory (RegTech) and supervisory (SupTech) tools, as well as through the regulation of the FinTech innovation market to ensure economic security.
Appears in Collections: Дисертації

Views

Australia Australia
1
Brazil Brazil
-709875502
Bulgaria Bulgaria
2034515516
China China
38361580
Côte d’Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire
1
Finland Finland
1
France France
147304
Germany Germany
2034515497
Greece Greece
5304982
Hong Kong SAR China Hong Kong SAR China
1
Ireland Ireland
157691
Israel Israel
108431
Japan Japan
1
Lithuania Lithuania
1
Mexico Mexico
1
Netherlands Netherlands
304836640
Poland Poland
364122059
Romania Romania
1
Russia Russia
1
Singapore Singapore
1
Slovakia Slovakia
5304861
South Africa South Africa
1
Spain Spain
1
Sweden Sweden
208055
Taiwan Taiwan
151720
Ukraine Ukraine
2030859714
United Kingdom United Kingdom
-917309486
United States United States
2030859690
Unknown Country Unknown Country
1034610599
Vietnam Vietnam
5304973

Downloads

Algeria Algeria
963699734
Australia Australia
739894906
Austria Austria
1648442807
Azerbaijan Azerbaijan
739894853
Bangladesh Bangladesh
1
Belarus Belarus
1369597093
Belgium Belgium
1648442808
Brazil Brazil
364122041
Bulgaria Bulgaria
-359617937
Canada Canada
-1809987329
China China
2030859716
Croatia Croatia
1
Cyprus Cyprus
739894820
Czechia Czechia
2030859666
Denmark Denmark
1
Estonia Estonia
-1809987315
Finland Finland
2030859692
France France
-327750233
Georgia Georgia
1648442802
Germany Germany
-327750241
Gibraltar Gibraltar
1
Greece Greece
762109053
Hong Kong SAR China Hong Kong SAR China
1
Hungary Hungary
1
India India
1
Indonesia Indonesia
304836607
Iran Iran
2030859691
Ireland Ireland
-327750239
Israel Israel
1369597054
Italy Italy
-1809987340
Japan Japan
178940
Kazakhstan Kazakhstan
157578
Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan
1
Latvia Latvia
141902
Lithuania Lithuania
-359618000
Mexico Mexico
1
Moldova Moldova
-1809987328
Netherlands Netherlands
-359617959
New Zealand New Zealand
1
Nigeria Nigeria
1
Norway Norway
-1809987292
Panama Panama
1
Poland Poland
2030859707
Romania Romania
39872
Russia Russia
-1809987298
Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
1
Serbia Serbia
1
Singapore Singapore
143847
Slovakia Slovakia
762108982
Slovenia Slovenia
151871
South Korea South Korea
29682
Spain Spain
364461380
Sweden Sweden
-354844291
Switzerland Switzerland
1
Taiwan Taiwan
99484
Tajikistan Tajikistan
1
Togo Togo
1
Turkey Turkey
-709875647
Ukraine Ukraine
-327750235
United Kingdom United Kingdom
-327750240
United States United States
-327750232
Unknown Country Unknown Country
2030859614
Uzbekistan Uzbekistan
117823
Vietnam Vietnam
58041

Files

File Size Format Downloads
diss_Rubanov.pdf 6,73 MB Adobe PDF 2051888335
critique_Zhylinska.pdf 758,2 kB Adobe PDF 2051888335
critique_Marhasova.pdf 573,02 kB Adobe PDF 2051888335
critique_Nechyporuk.pdf 1,21 MB Adobe PDF 2051888335

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.